collapse

Author Topic: What's the view on equality?  (Read 32612 times)

Redfaery

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1345
  • Total likes: 40
    • View Profile
Re: What's the view on equality?
« Reply #480 on: September 23, 2015, 11:15:02 am »
Quote from: Juniperberry;180313
I've just finished the book, but I'm not sure what you mean about the conclusion.
Giskard, the mechanical-looking robot turned out to be far more complex than Daneel and Jander, the androids. I seem to recall that his brain broke the barrier, so to speak.

It's been 15 years since I read the book though. So I could be misremembering.
KARMA: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Juniperberry

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Banned!
  • Posts: 1891
  • Total likes: 4
    • View Profile
Re: What's the view on equality?
« Reply #481 on: September 23, 2015, 12:16:33 pm »
Quote from: Redfaery;180314
Giskard, the mechanical-looking robot turned out to be far more complex than Daneel and Jander, the androids. I seem to recall that his brain broke the barrier, so to speak.

It's been 15 years since I read the book though. So I could be misremembering.

 
Ah. Yeah, in an accidental chance of programming Giskard gained telepathic abilities, and used that ability to his advantage in obeying the Three Laws.

Earlier in the book, two characters had discussed the legend of a telepathic robot who was rendered inactive by it's programmer through the application of an unsolvable contradiction of Laws concerning it's telepathy.

Since Giskard was aware of the legend, he kept his telepathic abilities a secret from his programmer. If not, he too would have been rendered inactive through "roblock". The Third Law of Robotics is that a robot must protect it's own existence as long as it does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. By hiding his telepathy, he was better able to follow the First and Second Law, whereas admitting his telepathy would have conflicted with all Three.  

So Giskard didn't break the Godel barrier, though he did have unique abilities.
The pace of progress in artificial intelligence (I’m not referring to narrow AI) is incredibly fast. [...] The risk of something seriously dangerous happening is in the five year timeframe. 10 years at most.--Elon Musk

I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence," [Bill] Gates wrote. "First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern. I agree with Elon Musk and some others on this and don\'t understand why some people are not concerned."

Redfaery

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1345
  • Total likes: 40
    • View Profile
Re: What's the view on equality?
« Reply #482 on: September 23, 2015, 12:23:41 pm »
Quote from: Juniperberry;180316
Ah. Yeah, in an accidental chance of programming Giskard gained telepathic abilities, and used that ability to his advantage in obeying the Three Laws.

Earlier in the book, two characters had discussed the legend of a telepathic robot who was rendered inactive by it's programmer through the application of an unsolvable contradiction of Laws concerning it's telepathy.

Since Giskard was aware of the legend, he kept his telepathic abilities a secret from his programmer. If not, he too would have been rendered inactive through "roblock". The Third Law of Robotics is that a robot must protect it's own existence as long as it does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. By hiding his telepathy, he was better able to follow the First and Second Law, whereas admitting his telepathy would have conflicted with all Three.  

So Giskard didn't break the Godel barrier, though he did have unique abilities.

 
Aaaaaaaah.....now the ending makes SOOOO much more sense to me. I read it when I was like, 16. So there was a lot I didn't get.
KARMA: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Juniperberry

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Banned!
  • Posts: 1891
  • Total likes: 4
    • View Profile
Re: What's the view on equality?
« Reply #483 on: September 23, 2015, 12:41:12 pm »
Quote from: Redfaery;180317
Aaaaaaaah.....now the ending makes SOOOO much more sense to me. I read it when I was like, 16. So there was a lot I didn't get.


After your first comment, I kept reading the book waiting for Plainclothesman Baley to find out that he was actually an advanced humanoid robot that was not bound by the Three Laws to the extent that he couldn't be "roblocked", and had therefore disproved the Godel Theorem.

It didn't help matters that the top roboticist kept hinting that he was studying the human brain for the advancement of a C/Fe culture, and that his adversary was trying to create a robot society that could reproduce and become generational. I was sure that Baley's Earth, with it's underground Cities and mechanical expressway strips, was actually a manufacturing warehouse for robots, and that his fear of nature and the chaotic Outside was the result of being a mechanical being of complete Order. :p
« Last Edit: September 23, 2015, 12:42:43 pm by Juniperberry »
The pace of progress in artificial intelligence (I’m not referring to narrow AI) is incredibly fast. [...] The risk of something seriously dangerous happening is in the five year timeframe. 10 years at most.--Elon Musk

I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence," [Bill] Gates wrote. "First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern. I agree with Elon Musk and some others on this and don\'t understand why some people are not concerned."

Redfaery

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1345
  • Total likes: 40
    • View Profile
Re: What's the view on equality?
« Reply #484 on: September 23, 2015, 12:43:16 pm »
Quote from: Juniperberry;180318
After your first comment, I kept reading the book waiting for Plainclothesman Baley to find out that he was actually an advanced humanoid robot that was not bound by the Three Laws to the extent that he couldn't be "roblocked", and had therefore disproved the Godel Theorem.

It didn't help matters that the top roboticist kept hinting that he was studying the human brain for the advancement of a C/Fe culture, and that his adversary was trying to create a robot society that could reproduce and become generational. I was sure that Baley's Earth, with it's underground Cities and mechanical expressway strips, was actually a manufacturing warehouse for robots, and that his fear of nature and the chaotic Outside was the result of being a mechanical being of complete Order. :p

 
That honestly would have been a much better ending. :ange:
KARMA: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
22 Replies
5115 Views
Last post February 21, 2012, 08:35:03 am
by Altair
48 Replies
9785 Views
Last post May 06, 2013, 12:40:30 am
by Louisvillian
12 Replies
2402 Views
Last post November 12, 2013, 06:06:34 pm
by Altair
1 Replies
1695 Views
Last post November 15, 2013, 03:36:37 pm
by RandallS
8 Replies
1758 Views
Last post December 21, 2013, 04:23:45 pm
by Melamphoros

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 304
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Please Donate!

The Cauldron's server is expensive and requires monthly payments. Please become a Bronze, Silver or Gold Donor if you can. Donations are needed every month. Without member support, we can't afford the server.

* Shop & Support TC

The links below are affiliate links. When you click on one of these links you will go to the listed shopping site with The Cauldron's affiliate code. Any purchases you make during your visit will earn TC a tiny percentage of your purchase price at no extra cost to you.

* In Memoriam

Chavi (2006)
Elspeth (2010)
Marilyn (2013)

* Cauldron Staff

Host:
Sunflower

Message Board Staff
Board Coordinator:
Darkhawk

Assistant Board Coordinator:
Aster Breo

Senior Staff:
Aisling, Allaya, Jenett, Sefiru

Staff:
Ashmire, EclecticWheel, HarpingHawke, Kylara, PerditaPickle, rocquelaire

Discord Chat Staff
Chat Coordinator:
Morag

'Up All Night' Coordinator:
Altair

Cauldron Council:
Bob, Catja, Chatelaine, Emma-Eldritch, Fausta, Jubes, Kelly, LyricFox, Phouka, Sperran, Star, Steve, Tana

Site Administrator:
Randall

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal