collapse

* "Unable to verify referring url. Please go back and try again" Problem Logging In?

If you get an "Unable to verify referring url. Please go back and try again" error when you try to log in, you need to be sure you are accessing the board with a url that starts with "https://ecauldron.com".  If it starts with https://www.ecauldron.com" (or "http://www.ecauldron.com") you will get this error because "www.ecauldron.com" is not technically the same website as "ecauldron.com". Moving to the more secure "https" means it is more picky about such things.

Author Topic: Federal court: Intent matters in migratory-bird deaths  (Read 1254 times)

Newsposter

  • Sr. Apprentice
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 59
  • Country: us
  • Total likes: 1
    • View Profile
    • http://ecauldron.com/
Federal court: Intent matters in migratory-bird deaths
« on: October 04, 2015, 06:53:49 pm »
"Companies accused of causing migratory bird deaths may be harder to successfully prosecute after a federal appeals court recently ruled that a century-old wildlife protection law only applies if the killing is intentional."

Read the Article
“We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -- John F. Kennedy

sailor

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1505
  • Total likes: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Federal court: Intent matters in migratory-bird deaths
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2015, 03:35:29 pm »
Quote from: Newsposter;180756
"Companies accused of causing migratory bird deaths may be harder to successfully prosecute after a federal appeals court recently ruled that a century-old wildlife protection law only applies if the killing is intentional."

Read the Article

 
I'd want a bit more information about the petro tanks from the 2003 case.  I'm wondering if it's an OSHA requirement that the tanks be open for safety / engineering reasons.

As for the power lines, seems odd that this is only coming to the fore now. It's not like it's a new technology.

Wind turbines are a new tech (relatively speaking).  So which goal is more important - save the birds or make something else. And if the wind companies get a pass for this, shouldn't other groups do so?

RandallS

  • Site Admin
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Location: NE Ohio
  • Posts: 10199
  • Country: us
  • Total likes: 265
    • View Profile
  • Religion: Hellenic Pagan
Re: Federal court: Intent matters in migratory-bird deaths
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2015, 09:29:47 pm »
Quote from: sailor;180783
Wind turbines are a new tech (relatively speaking).  So which goal is more important - save the birds or make something else. And if the wind companies get a pass for this, shouldn't other groups do so?

I think a middle point is reasonable. As long as a company takes reasonable actions to try to prevent unintentional incidental kills (within the limits of any regulations the company must follow as well), companies (or people, for that matter) should be held legally responsible for unintentional kills.
Randall
RetroRoleplaying [Blog]: Microlite74/75/78/81, BX Advanced, and Other Old School Tabletop RPGs
Microlite20: Lots of Rules Lite Tabletop RPGs -- Many Free
OSR.SPACE: Old School Tabletop RPG Community

sailor

  • Grand Master Member
  • *******
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1505
  • Total likes: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Federal court: Intent matters in migratory-bird deaths
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2015, 10:38:47 pm »
Quote from: RandallS;180791
I think a middle point is reasonable. As long as a company takes reasonable actions to try to prevent unintentional incidental kills (within the limits of any regulations the company must follow as well), companies (or people, for that matter) should be held legally responsible for unintentional kills.

 
I presume you left a "not" out of your sentence.

I'm not so sure about that.  Should a company be allowed to accidentally spill oil with no penalty?  While they can't bring the bird back to life, a civil fine (and criminal for not reporting if that's already the law) for incidental kills where the money goes to bird protection might help.

It becomes in the companies interest to minimize kills rather than just shrug them off as "you have to break eggs to have an omelet".

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
1534 Views
Last post January 28, 2013, 11:14:27 am
by Shine
16 Replies
2191 Views
Last post March 03, 2013, 01:23:45 pm
by Zoness
3 Replies
3111 Views
Last post August 25, 2014, 11:29:41 am
by veggiewolf
2 Replies
2150 Views
Last post October 18, 2015, 08:14:38 am
by RandallS
6 Replies
1622 Views
Last post June 17, 2017, 06:44:36 pm
by Dynes Hysbys

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 49
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 2
  • Dot Users Online:

* Please Donate!

The Cauldron's server is expensive and requires monthly payments. Please become a Bronze, Silver or Gold Donor if you can. Donations are needed every month. Without member support, we can't afford the server.

* Shop & Support TC

The links below are affiliate links. When you click on one of these links you will go to the listed shopping site with The Cauldron's affiliate code. Any purchases you make during your visit will earn TC a tiny percentage of your purchase price at no extra cost to you.

* In Memoriam

Chavi (2006)
Elspeth (2010)
Marilyn (2013)

* Cauldron Staff

Host:
Sunflower

Message Board Staff
Board Coordinator:
Darkhawk

Assistant Board Coordinator:
Aster Breo

Senior Staff:
Aisling, Jenett, Sefiru

Staff:
Allaya, Chatelaine, EclecticWheel, HarpingHawke, Kylara, PerditaPickle, rocquelaire

Discord Chat Staff
Chat Coordinator:
Morag

Cauldron Council:
Bob, Catja, Emma-Eldritch, Fausta, Jubes, Kelly, LyricFox, Phouka, Sperran, Star, Steve, Tana

Site Administrator:
Randall